Multi-market liquidity protocol for overcollateralized borrowing.
15of 16 scoped sources report
Covered
3
Partially covered
12
Missing
1
Coverage terms
CoveredProtocol-specific intelligence is available for the relevant protocol or version.
Partially coveredOnly a version, market, vault, feature, or limited evidence set is covered.
MissingNo protocol-specific provider entry has been found in this registry snapshot.
Snapshot note Static registry
Evidence at a glance
Aave has protocol-specific intelligence from 15 of 16 tracked sources, including 3 covered and 12 partial entries.
Coverage breadth
4 methodology lenses are represented. Rating sources contribute the largest share of indexed coverage.
Control context
5 sourced governance facts are indexed alongside 2 incident and 5 audit records.
Evidence quality
8 reporting sources include verified provider-authored text. Open the evidence cards below for scope and provenance.
Seen through 4 of 4 methodology lenses
Rating1 covered · 5 partial
Research1 covered · 2 partial
Dashboard0 covered · 5 partial
Monitoring1 covered · 0 partial
Counts show which methodology types contribute scoped evidence. They are not strength or quality scores.
Oracle diversity made visible
The 15 reporting feeds show different methodologies and assessments. Every provider-native position is shown side by side and is not reconciled into a single verdict.
Provider evidence
What each feed publishes
Methodology, version scope, provider-native ratings, and provenance — no synthesis.
Reference labelAave V3: 94% (PQR)Pending provider verification — not presented as provider-authored text.
Aave V3: Process Quality Review; ~94% (a 93% figure also appears across sources — confirm on the live PQR). Documentation, testing, audits, admin keys.
